Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln/Glassell Eviction Risk: Lower , Anaheim

Tract 06059076201 · Orange, CA · pop 7,841 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Here is how census tract 06059076201, in the Lincoln/Glassell neighborhood of Anaheim eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 7,841. On the national scale it ranks #31,643 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 46% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,692 a month against an average household income of $128,613 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 31% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 17% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units2,711
Renter share31.3%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$128,613

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Lincoln/Glassell
Very Low
Within parent city
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 28 tracts In Anaheim
Low
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#422 of 613 tracts In Orange
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#7,475 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anaheim and the region

Centroid at 33.8374, -117.8540 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln/Glassell scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anaheim
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,692 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anaheim
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anaheim
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0

How Lincoln/Glassell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln/Glassell risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 076201Anaheim: 8.08.0Anaheimparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln/Glassell. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln/Glassell

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059076201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059076201?

Census tract 06059076201 in the Lincoln/Glassell neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059076201?

Median gross rent is $2,692/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059076201?

5.6% of residents in tract 06059076201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,841.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059076201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 23th, minority 77th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 06059076201 considered part of Lincoln/Glassell?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059076201 fall within Lincoln/Glassell (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059076201 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059076201 compare to Anaheim overall?

Tract 06059076201 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Anaheim at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anaheim

Top eight tracts in Anaheim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related