Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1,292 of 84,120 nationally

Bannockburn Village Eviction Risk: High , Riverside

Tract 06065046501 · Riverside, CA · pop 6,264 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 06065046501 belongs to the Bannockburn Village neighborhood of Riverside, California. It is home to 6,264 residents and scores $1/10, an elevated reading for landlords. It lands near the 95th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

100% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 100% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Renters make up 100% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 100% Stable renters 0% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units12
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate100.0%

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Bannockburn Village
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 71 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#514 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverside and the region

Centroid at 33.9709, -117.3333 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bannockburn Village scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
100.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverside
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverside
6.5

How Bannockburn Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bannockburn Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 046501Riverside: 7.87.8Riversideparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bannockburn Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bannockburn Village

The heaviest input here is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverside eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 33.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 23.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Asian and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 68th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065046501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065046501?

Census tract 06065046501 in the Bannockburn Village neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065046501?

100.0% of residents in tract 06065046501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,264.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065046501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 2th, minority 86th, housing 79th.
Q4

Is tract 06065046501 considered part of Bannockburn Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065046501 fall within Bannockburn Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06065046501 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06065046501 compare to Riverside overall?

Tract 06065046501 scores 8.4/10, higher than the parent city of Riverside at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverside eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverside

Top eight tracts in Riverside ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related