Bannockburn Village Eviction Risk: High
2 census tracts · pop 10,103 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 8/10 · range 8–8
Bannockburn Village spans 2 census tracts of Riverside, CA, population 10,103. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 8/10, High tier. 72% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.
Cost burden runs 83% against 34.0% citywide, putting Bannockburn Village 49.2% over its own city. Average gross rent is $623, 67% below the Riverside average of $1,914.
The poverty rate is 76%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. 99% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building two streets over. The strongest single driver of the headline number is economic stress at 9.7/10.
Food insecurity affects 44.2% of adults, 26.4 points above the national rate. Set annual rent against average household income of $18,109 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 28.2% of adults, against 14.2% nationally. Among the 30 mapped neighborhoods of Riverside, it ranks #1 by risk, the upper third. The closest comparables inside the same city are University and Arlington.
Social vulnerability runs high at 7.9/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Its 2 tracts score within 0 points of one another, so the area figure travels well to individual addresses.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Bannockburn Village and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 8–8
Why Bannockburn Village scores 8
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyBannockburn Village vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
2 tracts in Bannockburn Village
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06065046501 | 8 | 6,264 | 100% | — |
| 06065046502 | 8 | 3,839 | 56% | $1,639 |
CDC SVI percentile: 77
Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Bannockburn Village
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 29.4%Housing insecurity
- 19.4%Utility shutoff threat
- 47.2%Food insecurity
- 49.2%SNAP enrollment
- 13.6%No health insurance
- 47.0%Any disability
About Bannockburn Village
How does Bannockburn Village compare to Riverside overall?
What is the average rent in Bannockburn Village?
What percentage of Bannockburn Village residents are renters?
Is Bannockburn Village a high social-vulnerability area?
Which tracts in Bannockburn Village have the highest eviction risk?
How safe is Bannockburn Village for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Bannockburn Village?
Other neighborhoods near Bannockburn Village
Other neighborhoods inside Riverside
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Bannockburn Village.