Neighborhood · Ranked #2,438 of 84,120 nationally

Bannockburn Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Riverside

Tract 06065046502 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,839 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 06065046502 covers the Bannockburn Village neighborhood of Riverside, home to 3,839 residents. For landlords it grades 6.8/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,639 a month against an average household income of $47,656 a year, roughly 41% of income at the averages. Renters make up 98% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

7.8

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 43% Owners 2%

Tract context

Occupied units1,057

Renter share98.1%

SVI overall0.90

Poverty rate36.3%

Median income$47,656

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverside and the region

Centroid at 33.9794, -117.3332 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bannockburn Village scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Riverside

5.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.4

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

36.3% poverty · this tract

9.1

Supply constraint

$1,639 rent vs county FMR

2.1

Rent control risk

Inherited from Riverside

5.5

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Riverside

5.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Riverside

6.5

How Bannockburn Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

90%Socioeconomic
7%Household composition
86%Racial/ethnic minority
100%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bannockburn Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

22.9%Housing insecurity
12.8%Utility-shutoff threat
31.9%Food insecurity
28.7%SNAP enrollment
18.2%Transit barriers
11.4%No health insurance
24.6%Frequent mental distress
35.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bannockburn Village

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverside eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065046502

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065046502?

Census tract 06065046502 in the Bannockburn Village neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06065046502?

Median gross rent is $1,639/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065046502?

36.3% of residents in tract 06065046502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,839.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065046502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 7th, minority 86th, housing 100th.

Is tract 06065046502 considered part of Bannockburn Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065046502 fall within Bannockburn Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06065046502 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06065046502 compare to Riverside overall?

Tract 06065046502 scores 7.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Riverside at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverside eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverside

Top eight tracts in Riverside ranked by composite eviction-risk score.