Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Bannockburn Village Eviction Risk: High , Riverside

Tract 06065046502 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,839 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 06065046502 covers part of the Bannockburn Village area of Riverside, CA, and scores 8/10 on landlord eviction risk. 98% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 43% Owners 2%
Tract context
Occupied units1,057
Renter share98.1%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate36.3%
Median income$47,656

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Bannockburn Village
Very Low
Within parent city
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 71 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 518 tracts In Riverside
High
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#3,534 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverside and the region

Centroid at 33.9794, -117.3332 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bannockburn Village scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
36.3% poverty · this tract
9.1
Supply constraint
$1,639 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverside
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverside
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverside
6.5

How Bannockburn Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bannockburn Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 046502Riverside: 6.66.6Riversideparent cityCounty: 6.66.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bannockburn Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bannockburn Village

The dominant input is economic stress at 9.1/10. Annualized rent equals 41% of average household income of $47,656, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 36%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.1/10. SNAP participation runs 28.7% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 1.4 points above the Riverside County average of 6.6. Housing insecurity runs 22.9% against 14.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,639, 14% below the Riverside average.

Nationally it ranks #7,836 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 56% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065046502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065046502?

Census tract 06065046502 in the Bannockburn Village neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065046502?

Median gross rent is $1,639/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065046502?

36.3% of residents in tract 06065046502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,839.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065046502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 7th, minority 86th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06065046502 considered part of Bannockburn Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065046502 fall within Bannockburn Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065046502 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065046502 compare to Riverside overall?

Tract 06065046502 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Riverside at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverside eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverside

Top eight tracts in Riverside ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related