Census Tract · Ranked #11,153 of 84,120 nationally
Citrus Heights Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067008136 ·
Sacramento, CA · pop 3,114
06067008136 is a census tract in Citrus Heights, CA. It scores 7.3/10 for landlords. The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33%Stable renters 35%Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units1,266
Renter share67.9%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate12.2%
Median income$70,648
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
74th percentile
#6 of 20 tracts In Citrus Heights
Elevated
Within county
53th percentile
#170 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Moderate
Within state
48th percentile
#4,738 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
87th percentile
#11,153 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Citrus Heights and the region
Centroid at 38.6856, -121.2954 · click any tract to drill in
Why Citrus Heights scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Citrus Heights
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.2% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,718 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Citrus Heights
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Citrus Heights
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Citrus Heights
6.5
How Citrus Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.9%Housing insecurity
7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
15.0%Food insecurity
16.4%SNAP enrollment
8.9%Transit barriers
7.8%No health insurance
18.9%Frequent mental distress
36.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Citrus Heights
What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.1/10. 68% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.8/10. On the national scale it lands near the 87th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. about half of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,718, close to the Citrus Heights average. Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $70,648.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008136
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008136?
Census tract 06067008136 in Citrus Heights scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008136?
Median gross rent is $1,718/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008136?
12.2% of residents in tract 06067008136 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,114.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008136?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 24th, minority 33th, housing 75th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067008136 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067008136 compare to Citrus Heights overall?
Tract 06067008136 scores 7.3/10, higher than the parent city of Citrus Heights at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Citrus Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Citrus Heights
Top eight tracts in Citrus Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.