Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Lavender Heights Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento

Tract 06067000700 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,614 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 06067000700 covers part of the Lavender Heights area of Sacramento, CA, and scores 9.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 54% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units611
Renter share91.8%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate50.0%
Median income$14,978

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#6 of 14 tracts In Lavender Heights
Elevated
Within parent city
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#26 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5819, -121.5017 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lavender Heights scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
50.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$392 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Lavender Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lavender Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 000700Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lavender Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lavender Heights

Average gross rent is $392, 78% below the Sacramento average. The poverty rate is 50%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. 92% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Disability prevalence runs 52.4% against 31.5% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 34.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.2 points. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.

The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Cost burden runs 42% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067000700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000700?

Census tract 06067000700 in the Lavender Heights neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067000700?

Median gross rent is $392/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000700?

50.0% of residents in tract 06067000700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,614.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 62th, minority 78th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06067000700 considered part of Lavender Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067000700 fall within Lavender Heights (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067000700 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067000700 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067000700 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067000700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 15% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related