Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #434 of 84,120 nationally

Lavender Heights Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento

Tract 06067000700 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,614 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 7.2/10 for census tract 06067000700 reflects conditions in Lavender Heights in Sacramento, California. That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 42% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $392 monthly, set against $14,978 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 92% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 54% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units611
Renter share91.8%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate50.0%
Median income$14,978

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 14 tracts In Lavender Heights
Very High
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#140 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5819, -121.5017 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lavender Heights scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
50.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$392 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Lavender Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lavender Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.09.0This tracttract 000700Sacramento: 9.29.2Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lavender Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lavender Heights

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 15% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067000700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000700?

Census tract 06067000700 in the Lavender Heights neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067000700?

Median gross rent is $392/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000700?

50.0% of residents in tract 06067000700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,614.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 62th, minority 78th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06067000700 considered part of Lavender Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067000700 fall within Lavender Heights (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067000700 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067000700 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067000700 scores 9/10, right in line with the parent city of Sacramento at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067000700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 15% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related