Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Lavender Heights Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento

Tract 06067001103 · Sacramento, CA · pop 1,308 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 9.3/10, tract 06067001103 in the Lavender Heights area of Sacramento, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,308. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 33% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units999
Renter share80.8%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate32.5%
Median income$33,706

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 14 tracts In Lavender Heights
High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#29 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5774, -121.4933 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lavender Heights scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
32.5% poverty · this tract
8.1
Supply constraint
$884 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Lavender Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lavender Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 001103Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lavender Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lavender Heights

Average gross rent is $884, 50% below the Sacramento average. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10.

It sits 2.2 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1. 81% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

The poverty rate is 33%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 59% of renters here are cost-burdened.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.6/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067001103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067001103?

Census tract 06067001103 in the Lavender Heights neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067001103?

Median gross rent is $884/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067001103?

32.5% of residents in tract 06067001103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,308.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067001103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 20th, minority 64th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 06067001103 considered part of Lavender Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067001103 fall within Lavender Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067001103 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067001103 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067001103 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067001103 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 19% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related