Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Lavender Heights Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento

Tract 06067001102 · Sacramento, CA · pop 1,627 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06067001102 covers part of the Lavender Heights area of Sacramento, CA, and scores 9.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,627. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 39% Owners 14%
Tract context
Occupied units1,060
Renter share85.6%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate23.3%
Median income$61,190

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 14 tracts In Lavender Heights
High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#28 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5767, -121.4821 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lavender Heights scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.3% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$1,725 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Lavender Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lavender Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 001102Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lavender Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lavender Heights

86% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.2 points.

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $61,190 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8/10. The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,725, close to the Sacramento average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067001102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067001102?

Census tract 06067001102 in the Lavender Heights neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067001102?

Median gross rent is $1,725/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067001102?

23.3% of residents in tract 06067001102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,627.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067001102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 7th, minority 66th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 06067001102 considered part of Lavender Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067001102 fall within Lavender Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067001102 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067001102 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067001102 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067001102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related