Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,214 of 84,120 nationally

McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067005402 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,032 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 06067005402 covers McKinley Village in Sacramento, home to 3,032 residents. For landlords it grades 7.1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

57% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,900 a month against an average household income of $62,012 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. Renters make up 99% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 56% Stable renters 43% Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units1,588
Renter share99.2%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate23.5%
Median income$62,012

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In McKinley Village
Very High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#33 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#1,003 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5898, -121.4321 · click any tract to drill in

Why McKinley Village scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.5% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,900 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How McKinley Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
McKinley Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.97.9This tracttract 005402Sacramento: 9.29.2Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Sacramento County average of 6.3 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067005402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067005402?

Census tract 06067005402 in the McKinley Village neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067005402?

Median gross rent is $1,900/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067005402?

23.5% of residents in tract 06067005402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,032.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067005402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 76th, minority 70th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06067005402 considered part of McKinley Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067005402 fall within McKinley Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067005402 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067005402 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067005402 scores 7.9/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related