Neighborhood · Ranked #2,922 of 84,120 nationally

Diamond Heights Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075021000 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,820 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06075021000 covers part of the Diamond Heights area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,820 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.4

High

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 35% Owners 41%

Tract context

Occupied units1,758

Renter share59.0%

SVI overall0.46

Poverty rate9.8%

Median income$157,027

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7516, -122.4228 · click any tract to drill in

Why Diamond Heights scores 9.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from San Francisco

9.8

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

8.6

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

9.8% poverty · this tract

2.4

Supply constraint

$2,504 rent vs county FMR

2.5

Rent control risk

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

10.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from San Francisco

9.5

How Diamond Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

25%Socioeconomic
15%Household composition
55%Racial/ethnic minority
90%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
31%Grade C
60%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Diamond Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.6%Housing insecurity
4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
8.9%Food insecurity
7.3%SNAP enrollment
5.7%Transit barriers
5.1%No health insurance
15.0%Frequent mental distress
20.4%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Diamond Heights

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 8.9% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.3% against 15.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely. Average gross rent is $2,504, close to the San Francisco average.

Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $157,027. 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075021000

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075021000?

Census tract 06075021000 in the Diamond Heights neighborhood scores 9.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06075021000?

Median gross rent is $2,504/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075021000?

9.8% of residents in tract 06075021000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,820.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075021000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 15th, minority 55th, housing 90th.

Is tract 06075021000 considered part of Diamond Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075021000 fall within Diamond Heights (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06075021000 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06075021000 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075021000 scores 9.4/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06075021000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 60% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.