Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally

Jordan Park Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075045201 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,104 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

06075045201 is a census tract in the Jordan Park area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9/10 for landlords. roughly one in eight of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.

Risk score
9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 43% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,324
Renter share48.8%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$178,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Jordan Park
Elevated
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#192 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#183 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,820 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7770, -122.4696 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jordan Park scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,891 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Jordan Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jordan Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.0This tracttract 0452019.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Jordan Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jordan Park

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. At $2,891 a month, rents run 17% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.

SNAP participation runs 6.6% against 15.2% nationally. The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 4.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075045201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075045201?

Census tract 06075045201 in the Jordan Park neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075045201?

Median gross rent is $2,891/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075045201?

5.1% of residents in tract 06075045201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,104.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075045201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 68th, minority 74th, housing 44th.
Q5

Is tract 06075045201 considered part of Jordan Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075045201 fall within Jordan Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075045201 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075045201 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075045201 scores 9/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075045201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related