Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Duboce Triangle Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075020102 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,310 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 06075020102 covers part of the Duboce Triangle area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 58% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units1,396
Renter share82.4%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate24.5%
Median income$108,095

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 14 tracts In Duboce Triangle
Very High
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#72 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Elevated
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7651, -122.4197 · click any tract to drill in

Why Duboce Triangle scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
24.5% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,405 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Duboce Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Duboce Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 0201029.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Duboce Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Duboce Triangle

Average gross rent is $1,405, 43% below the San Francisco average. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 29% of renters here are cost-burdened.

16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 25%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $108,095, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075020102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075020102?

Census tract 06075020102 in the Duboce Triangle neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075020102?

Median gross rent is $1,405/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075020102?

24.5% of residents in tract 06075020102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,310.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075020102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 59th, minority 79th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 06075020102 considered part of Duboce Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075020102 fall within Duboce Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075020102 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075020102 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075020102 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075020102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related