Neighborhood · Ranked #2,339 of 84,120 nationally

Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075047701 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,848 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 9.7/10, tract 06075047701 in the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.7

High

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 34% Owners 42%

Tract context

Occupied units2,008

Renter share58.2%

SVI overall0.51

Poverty rate8.6%

Median income$116,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7783, -122.4841 · click any tract to drill in

Why Seacliff scores 9.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from San Francisco

9.8

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

8.6

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

8.6% poverty · this tract

2.1

Supply constraint

$2,103 rent vs county FMR

1.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

10.0

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from San Francisco

10.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from San Francisco

9.5

How Seacliff compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

53%Socioeconomic
26%Household composition
78%Racial/ethnic minority
49%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
85%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.2%Housing insecurity
4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
10.6%Food insecurity
8.0%SNAP enrollment
6.0%Transit barriers
5.2%No health insurance
13.8%Frequent mental distress
22.7%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Seacliff

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Average gross rent is $2,103, 15% below the San Francisco average. SNAP participation runs 8.0% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.6/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter. 41% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $116,750.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075047701

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075047701?

Census tract 06075047701 in the Seacliff neighborhood scores 9.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06075047701?

Median gross rent is $2,103/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075047701?

8.6% of residents in tract 06075047701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,848.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075047701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 26th, minority 78th, housing 49th.

Is tract 06075047701 considered part of Seacliff?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075047701 fall within Seacliff (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06075047701 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06075047701 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075047701 scores 9.7/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06075047701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.