Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075047904 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,145 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

06075047904 is a census tract in the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 30% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,469
Renter share57.0%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate20.5%
Median income$87,494

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 15 tracts In Seacliff
Very High
Within parent city
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#67 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Elevated
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7825, -122.5099 · click any tract to drill in

Why Seacliff scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
20.5% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$2,970 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Seacliff compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Seacliff risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 0479049.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Seacliff

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Set annual rent against average income of $87,494 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Cost burden runs 48% here against 37.3% across San Francisco County. Average gross rent is $2,970, 20% above the San Francisco average. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075047904

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075047904?

Census tract 06075047904 in the Seacliff neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075047904?

Median gross rent is $2,970/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075047904?

20.5% of residents in tract 06075047904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,145.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075047904?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 93th, minority 60th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 06075047904 considered part of Seacliff?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075047904 fall within Seacliff (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075047904 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075047904 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075047904 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075047904 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related