Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075060100 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,952 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
Census tract 06075060100 covers part of the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,952 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.8073, -122.4749 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seacliff scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Seacliff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 61%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.3%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 4.2%SNAP enrollment
- 4.4%Transit barriers
- 3.6%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 16.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Seacliff
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. 100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.
Disability prevalence runs 16.5% against 31.5% nationally. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 5.7% against 17.8% nationally.
Against the San Francisco County average of 9.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #4,888 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $236,190, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075060100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075060100?
What is the average rent in tract 06075060100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075060100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075060100?
Is tract 06075060100 considered part of Seacliff?
What share of households in tract 06075060100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075060100 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075060100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.