Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally

Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075060100 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,952 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

Census tract 06075060100 covers part of the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,952 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 63% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units1,338
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate0.7%
Median income$236,190

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 15 tracts In Seacliff
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#242 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#237 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,258 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.8073, -122.4749 · click any tract to drill in

Why Seacliff scores 8.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Seacliff compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Seacliff risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.7This tracttract 0601009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Seacliff

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. 100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Disability prevalence runs 16.5% against 31.5% nationally. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 5.7% against 17.8% nationally.

Against the San Francisco County average of 9.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #4,888 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $236,190, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075060100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075060100?

Census tract 06075060100 in the Seacliff neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075060100?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075060100?

0.7% of residents in tract 06075060100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,952.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075060100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 10th, minority 61th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 06075060100 considered part of Seacliff?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075060100 fall within Seacliff (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075060100 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075060100 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075060100 scores 8.7/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075060100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related