North of Panhandle Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075016601 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,202 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 06075016601 sits in the North of Panhandle area of San Francisco eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7709, -122.4449 · click any tract to drill in
Why North of Panhandle scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow North of Panhandle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 12%Grade C
- 59%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North of Panhandle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 7.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.8%Transit barriers
- 4.6%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 20.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in North of Panhandle
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Severe burden reaches 12%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 8.3% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. At $2,784 a month, rents run 12% over what the rest of San Francisco commands. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for roughly one in three of renters.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075016601
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075016601?
What is the average rent in tract 06075016601?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075016601?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075016601?
Is tract 06075016601 considered part of North of Panhandle?
What share of households in tract 06075016601 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075016601 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075016601 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.