Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Naglee Park Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

Tract 06085501402 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 2,705 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06085501402 in the Naglee Park area of San Jose, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 64% here against 43.5% across Santa Clara County.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 20% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units839
Renter share56.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$93,092

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Naglee Park
Moderate
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#20 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Very High
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3453, -121.8665 · click any tract to drill in

Why Naglee Park scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$2,504 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Naglee Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Naglee Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 5014029.0San Joseparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Naglee Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Naglee Park

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10.

Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against the Santa Clara County average of 8.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points.

Annualized rent equals 32% of average household income of $93,092, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10. Housing insecurity runs 21.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 24.8% against 17.8% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.1/10.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085501402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085501402?

Census tract 06085501402 in the Naglee Park neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085501402?

Median gross rent is $2,504/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085501402?

15.9% of residents in tract 06085501402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,705.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085501402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 83th, minority 80th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 06085501402 considered part of Naglee Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085501402 fall within Naglee Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085501402 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085501402 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085501402 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085501402 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related