Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,919 of 84,120 nationally

Fairmeadow Eviction Risk: Elevated , Palo Alto

Tract 06085510802 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 1,997 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 7/10, tract 06085510802 in the Fairmeadow area of Palo Alto, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 18% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units710
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate2.8%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Fairmeadow
Very Low
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 16 tracts In Palo Alto
Elevated
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#300 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#5,249 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palo Alto and the region

Centroid at 37.4144, -122.1104 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairmeadow scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palo Alto
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palo Alto
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palo Alto
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palo Alto
3.9

How Fairmeadow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairmeadow risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.0This tracttract 5108027.6Palo Altoparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fairmeadow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairmeadow

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10.

The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 3.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Against Santa Clara County at 43.5%, 37% of renters here are cost-burdened. It sits 1.0 points below the Santa Clara County average of 8.0. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

On the national scale it lands near the 85th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 17%. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085510802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085510802?

Census tract 06085510802 in the Fairmeadow neighborhood scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085510802?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085510802?

2.8% of residents in tract 06085510802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,997.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085510802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 66th, minority 64th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 06085510802 considered part of Fairmeadow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085510802 fall within Fairmeadow (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085510802 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085510802 compare to Palo Alto overall?

Tract 06085510802 scores 7/10, lower than the parent city of Palo Alto at 7.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palo Alto

Top eight tracts in Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related