Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Fairmeadow Eviction Risk: Lower , Palo Alto

Tract 06085510803 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,435 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Here is how census tract 06085510803, in Fairmeadow in Palo Alto, looks to a landlord: a 4.4/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,435. That is riskier than roughly 21% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 20% of renter households, a modest level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,667 a month against an average household income of $250,001 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 57% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

3.4

Lower

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 46% Owners 43%

Tract context

Occupied units1,193

Renter share57.1%

SVI overall0.36

Poverty rate9.6%

Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Palo Alto and the region

Centroid at 37.4206, -122.1184 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairmeadow scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Palo Alto

8.1

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.4

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

9.6% poverty · this tract

2.4

Supply constraint

$2,667 rent vs county FMR

2.7

Rent control risk

Inherited from Palo Alto

4.4

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.6

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Palo Alto

8.8

Housing court bias

Inherited from Palo Alto

3.9

How Fairmeadow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

9%Socioeconomic
65%Household composition
71%Racial/ethnic minority
54%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fairmeadow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

6.2%Housing insecurity
3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
7.6%Food insecurity
5.5%SNAP enrollment
4.6%Transit barriers
3.6%No health insurance
12.0%Frequent mental distress
22.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairmeadow

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Palo Alto, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 36th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085510803

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085510803?

Census tract 06085510803 in the Fairmeadow neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06085510803?

Median gross rent is $2,667/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085510803?

9.6% of residents in tract 06085510803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,435.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085510803?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 65th, minority 71th, housing 54th.

Is tract 06085510803 considered part of Fairmeadow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085510803 fall within Fairmeadow (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06085510803 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06085510803 compare to Palo Alto overall?

Tract 06085510803 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Palo Alto at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palo Alto; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palo Alto

Top eight tracts in Palo Alto ranked by composite eviction-risk score.