Gardner Eviction Risk: Lower , San Jose
Tract 06085502601 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,048 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 06085502601, home to 3,048 residents in the Gardner area of San Jose, scores 6.1/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #18,054 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
72% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,501 monthly, set against $160,972 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.2902, -121.9147 · click any tract to drill in
Why Gardner scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Gardner compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 61%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Gardner. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.4%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 26.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Gardner
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 59th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 06085502601
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085502601?
What is the average rent in tract 06085502601?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085502601?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085502601?
Is tract 06085502601 considered part of Gardner?
What share of households in tract 06085502601 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085502601 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085502601 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.