Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Gardner Eviction Risk: Moderate , San Jose

Tract 06085502104 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 2,634 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 06085502104 covers Gardner in San Jose in California. Home to 2,634 residents, it scores $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

56% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,753 a month against an average household income of $126,932 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 67% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 29% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units1,013
Renter share66.8%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$126,932

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Gardner
Low
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#132 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Low
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#144 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Elevated
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,017 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3061, -121.9279 · click any tract to drill in

Why Gardner scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,753 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Gardner compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Gardner risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 502104San Jose: 9.29.2San Joseparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Gardner. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Gardner

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085502104

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085502104?

Census tract 06085502104 in the Gardner neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085502104?

Median gross rent is $2,753/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085502104?

4.7% of residents in tract 06085502104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,634.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085502104?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 29th, minority 78th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 06085502104 considered part of Gardner?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085502104 fall within Gardner (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085502104 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085502104 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085502104 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related