Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Notting Hill - Royal Crest Eviction Risk: Lower , San Jose

Tract 06085504311 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 8,064 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06085504311 runs through the Notting Hill - Royal Crest area of San Jose. With 8,064 residents, it scores 5.6/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #31,806 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $3,086 monthly, set against $173,188 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 43% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 28% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units3,109
Renter share43.5%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$173,188

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Notting Hill - Royal Crest
Low
Within parent city
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#152 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Low
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#176 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Elevated
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#7,168 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3775, -121.8846 · click any tract to drill in

Why Notting Hill - Royal Crest scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$3,086 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Notting Hill - Royal Crest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Notting Hill - Royal Crest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 504311San Jose: 9.29.2San Joseparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Notting Hill - Royal Crest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Notting Hill - Royal Crest

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085504311

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085504311?

Census tract 06085504311 in the Notting Hill - Royal Crest neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085504311?

Median gross rent is $3,086/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085504311?

5.0% of residents in tract 06085504311 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,064.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085504311?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 5th, minority 91th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 06085504311 considered part of Notting Hill - Royal Crest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085504311 fall within Notting Hill - Royal Crest (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085504311 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085504311 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085504311 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related