Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally
Seacliff Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06087122100 · Santa Cruz, CA · pop 3,550 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Seacliff
Tract 06087122100 sits in Seacliff, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. Population here is 3,550. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,623
Renter share40.0%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$121,845
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
32
th percentile
Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
National
72
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Seacliff and the region
Centroid at 36.9733, -121.9173 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seacliff scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Seacliff
8.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.0
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,410 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Seacliff
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Seacliff
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Seacliff
4.2
How Seacliff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.9%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.6%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 5.7%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 26.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Seacliff
Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 1.2/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.3/10.
Against Santa Cruz County at 48.5%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Santa Cruz County average of 6.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points. 11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 72% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent is $2,410, close to the Seacliff average.
Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $121,845.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06087122100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06087122100?
Census tract 06087122100 in Seacliff scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06087122100?
Median gross rent is $2,410/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06087122100?
5.1% of residents in tract 06087122100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,550.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06087122100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 38th, minority 48th, housing 31th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06087122100 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06087122100 compare to Seacliff overall?
Tract 06087122100 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Seacliff at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Seacliff; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related