Skip to content
Map of Santa Cruz County, CA eviction risk by city, county average 5.5 out of 10
County brief·Updated July 25, 2026

Santa Cruz County, California Eviction Risk: High

33 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Santa Cruz (8.4) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
8.2
HIGH

Ranked #14 of 58 CA counties

225k residents · 33 cities · 69 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Santa Cruz County eviction risk score history

Min2.4 Average4.5 Now8.2
10 5 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.7 1993 · score 3.8 1994 · score 3.8 1995 · score 3.6 1996 · score 3.7 1997 · score 3.7 1998 · score 3.7 1999 · score 3.8 2000 · score 3.7 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 3.8 2003 · score 3.9 2004 · score 4.0 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.2 2008 · score 5.0 2009 · score 5.2 2010 · score 5.3 2011 · score 5.4 2012 · score 5.4 2013 · score 5.4 2014 · score 5.5 2015 · score 5.4 2016 · score 5.8 2017 · score 5.9 2018 · score 6.1 2019 · score 6.9 2020 · score 9.3 2021 · score 9.0 2022 · score 8.5 2023 · score 8.3 2024 · score 8.6 2025 · score 8.2 2026 · score 8.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Santa Cruz County's average eviction-risk score of 8.4/10 spans a range of 7.2 to 8.4 across 33 cities, with Sand City anchoring the high end at 8.1/10. Ranked 44th of 58 California counties (lower-risk third of the state).

How Santa Cruz County ranks in California

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
High
#14 of 58 CA counties 8.2 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 77th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 58 counties in California for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Very High
#1 of 51 states (statewide) 110.7 index
Cost of living, 100th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #1 of 51 states on overall cost of living (10.7% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Very High
#2 of 51 states (statewide) 154.3 index
Housing services cost, 98th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #2 of 51 states on housing services (54.3% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Low
#46 of 58 CA counties 31.0% of income
Income spent on rent, 21st percentileLowHigh
#46 of 58 counties in California on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for California

State-specific playbooks
California Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
California Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
California Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
California Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
California Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Santa Cruz County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Santa Cruz Pop 61,607 · 32.5% income · $2,452 rent · Dem 61,607 8.4 32.5% $2,452 Dem
002 Watsonville Pop 51,712 · 33.8% income · $1,889 rent · Dem 51,712 8.3 33.8% $1,889 Dem
003 Scotts Valley Pop 12,044 · 30.0% income · $2,491 rent · Dem 12,044 7.8 30.0% $2,491 Dem
004 Soquel Pop 10,679 · 29.8% income · $2,266 rent · Dem 10,679 8.1 29.8% $2,266 Dem
005 Capitola Pop 9,689 · 28.2% income · $2,512 rent · Dem 9,689 8.0 28.2% $2,512 Dem
006 Rio del Mar Pop 9,201 · 30.7% income · $3,407 rent · Dem 9,201 8.0 30.7% $3,407 Dem
007 Interlaken Pop 8,068 · 42.7% income · $1,941 rent · Dem 8,068 8.1 42.7% $1,941 Dem
008 Ben Lomond Pop 6,858 · 34.6% income · $2,514 rent · Dem 6,858 8.3 34.6% $2,514 Dem
009 Aptos Pop 6,404 · 24.3% income · $2,059 rent · Dem 6,404 7.8 24.3% $2,059 Dem
010 Pleasure Point Pop 5,489 · 24.9% income · $2,705 rent · Dem 5,489 7.8 24.9% $2,705 Dem
011 Boulder Creek Pop 4,632 · 37.8% income · $1,907 rent · Dem 4,632 8.3 37.8% $1,907 Dem
012 Felton Pop 4,093 · 29.3% income · $2,068 rent · Dem 4,093 7.8 29.3% $2,068 Dem
013 Day Valley Pop 3,579 · 13.6% income · $1,669 rent · Dem 3,579 7.7 13.6% $1,669 Dem
014 Las Lomas Pop 3,355 · 51.0% income · $1,969 rent · Dem 3,355 7.8 51.0% $1,969 Dem
015 Seacliff Pop 3,299 · 30.0% income · $2,462 rent · Dem 3,299 8.0 30.0% $2,462 Dem
016 Freedom Pop 3,172 · 27.9% income · $1,621 rent · Dem 3,172 7.8 27.9% $1,621 Dem
017 Bonny Doon Pop 3,149 · 26.9% income · $1,838 rent · Dem 3,149 8.0 26.9% $1,838 Dem
018 Amesti Pop 2,818 · 51.0% income · $1,660 rent · Dem 2,818 8.4 51.0% $1,660 Dem
019 La Selva Beach Pop 2,302 · 24.0% income · $3,379 rent · Dem 2,302 7.8 24.0% $3,379 Dem
020 Aptos Hills-Larkin Valley Pop 2,127 · 36.0% income · $3,501 rent · Dem 2,127 8.0 36.0% $3,501 Dem
021 Corralitos Pop 1,884 · 19.1% income · $2,218 rent · Dem 1,884 8.0 19.1% $2,218 Dem
022 Elkhorn Pop 1,664 · 37.7% income · $2,000 rent · Dem 1,664 8.3 37.7% $2,000 Dem
023 Brookdale Pop 1,378 · 31.2% income · $1,814 rent · Dem 1,378 8.2 31.2% $1,814 Dem
024 Boronda Pop 1,351 · 39.4% income · $2,112 rent · Dem 1,351 8.4 39.4% $2,112 Dem
025 Mount Hermon Pop 939 · 13.5% income · $1,394 rent · Dem 939 7.2 13.5% $1,394 Dem
026 Lompico Pop 788 · 30.9% income · $2,421 rent · Dem 788 8.2 30.9% $2,421 Dem
027 Pasatiempo Pop 610 · 30.9% income · $2,421 rent · Dem 610 7.5 30.9% $2,421 Dem
028 Paradise Park Pop 470 · 30.9% income · $2,421 rent · Dem 470 8.1 30.9% $2,421 Dem
029 Sand City Pop 404 · 46.5% income · $2,316 rent · Dem 404 8.1 46.5% $2,316 Dem
030 Davenport Pop 403 · 28.8% income · $1,469 rent · Dem 403 8.3 28.8% $1,469 Dem
031 Zayante Pop 399 · 13.2% income · $2,260 rent · Dem 399 7.5 13.2% $2,260 Dem
032 Pajaro Dunes Pop 143 · 30.9% income · $2,421 rent · Dem 143 7.8 30.9% $2,421 Dem
033 Twin Lakes Pop 8 · 30.9% income · $2,421 rent · Dem 8 8.0 30.9% $2,421 Dem

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Santa Cruz County carries an average eviction-risk score of 8.4/10, placing it in the Elevated tier and ranking 44th of 58 California eviction laws counties, meaning 43 counties statewide are riskier and only 14 are more landlord-friendly. For owners and investors operating across the county's 33 cities, that composite figure tells only part of the story: scores range from 7.2 to 8.4 depending on which community you are in, a spread wide enough to meaningfully change operating risk from one neighborhood to the next.

With an average rent of $2,269 per month and a rent-burden rate of 32.2%, a significant share of tenants in Santa Cruz County are financially stretched, which correlates with elevated late-payment and non-payment exposure. Renter households make up 42% of the county total, giving landlords a substantial tenant pool but also a market where tenant-protection enforcement is closely watched. California's regulatory environment layers additional complexity on top of these local conditions.

The cities inside Santa Cruz County

Sand City is the clear outlier at 8.1/10, a full point above the next tier and the only location in the county that approaches a high-risk designation. Davenport comes in at 8.3/10, while Pleasure Point, Seacliff, Freedom, Brookdale, and Boronda each score 7.8/10, all noticeably above the county average. Among the larger cities, Watsonville (8.3/10, population 51,712) and Santa Cruz (8.4/10, population 61,607) sit near the county midpoint, while Scotts Valley and Capitola both score 7.8/10, the lowest readings in the dataset. That 1.5-point gap between Sand City and the lowest-risk communities is not trivial: it reflects real differences in payment history patterns, economic stress, and local conditions that underwrite performance on a per-door basis.

Because risk is this hyper-local across a single county, working with a professional property manager who tracks conditions city by city is precisely why many investors choose that route when operating in a market as varied as this one.

State-level laws that apply here

Every landlord in Santa Cruz County operates under California eviction laws state law, regardless of which city their property sits in. For non-payment of rent or a curable lease violation, the required notice period is 3 days under CCP § 1161. No-cause terminations require 30 days notice for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more under Civ. Code § 1946.1. Properties covered by AB 1482 face a rent cap formula of 5% plus CPI, capped at 10%, and just-cause eviction requirements apply under CA Civil Code § 1946.2. An uncontested unlawful detainer typically resolves in 35 to 60 days; a contested case can run 75 to 180 days. Court filing fees range from $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees typically run $1,500 to $4,500. Understanding the full California eviction laws eviction process before you need it is essential planning for any landlord in this county.

California security deposit limits, screening rules, and fair-housing obligations under the California eviction laws Civil Rights Department add further layers. California tenant protections are enforced vigorously here, and landlords should review each requirement carefully before acquiring property or revising lease terms. Landlords must give 24 hours notice before entry, source-of-income discrimination is prohibited, and application fees are capped under Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.6.

With a poverty rate of 11.7% and 42% of households renting, the county's economic pressures are real but not extreme compared with higher-risk California markets; review the city grid above to identify which of the 33 tracked communities best fits your risk tolerance before committing capital.

Historical eviction filings in Santa Cruz County

From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in Santa Cruz County declined 47%. The peak was 765 filings in 2010.1

Annual filings 2010–2017 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Santa Cruz County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2010: 765 filings2011: 682 filings2012: 626 filings2013: 480 filings2014: 488 filings2015: 482 filings2016: 412 filings2017: 407 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Santa Cruz County compares

Among comparable California eviction laws coastal counties, Santa Cruz County's average eviction-risk score of 8.4/10 positions it above Marin County (5.21/10), San Luis Obispo County (5.33/10), and Napa County (5.38/10), roughly in line with Santa Barbara County (5.56/10), and below Yolo County (5.81/10). Within California, Santa Cruz County ranks 44th of 58 counties on eviction risk (where rank 1 is the highest-risk), meaning 43 counties carry more risk and only 14 are less risky, placing Santa Cruz in the lower-risk third of the state despite its Elevated designation.

Peer counties in California

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Marin County eviction risk
8.2
/ 10 · High
Pop. 239K
Peer county
Monterey County eviction risk
8.2
/ 10 · High
Pop. 360K
Peer county
Yolo County eviction risk
8
/ 10 · High
Pop. 210K
Peer county
Tulare County eviction risk
8.2
/ 10 · High
Pop. 410K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Santa Cruz County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Santa Cruz County

Q1

How does Santa Cruz County compare to California statewide?

Santa Cruz County averages 8.2/10. Use the California overview link in the breadcrumb above for statewide comparison.
Q2

Is 32.2% rent-to-income ratio high for Santa Cruz County?

32.2% is above the 30% federal threshold.
Q3

Where can I see all cities in Santa Cruz County?

The city grid above lists every municipality in Santa Cruz County with its risk score and population.