Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Hickman Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06099002901 ·
Stanislaus, CA · pop 5,103 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Hickman
Hickman in Stanislaus County anchors census tract 06099002901, which lands at 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 14% of US census tracts.
17% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,537 monthly, set against $95,119 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 28%Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,614
Renter share34.3%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$95,119
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Hickman
Moderate
Within county
1th percentile
#111 of 112 tracts In Stanislaus
Very Low
Within state
16th percentile
#7,640 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
43th percentile
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hickman and the region
Centroid at 37.6014, -120.6513 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hickman scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hickman
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,537 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hickman
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hickman
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hickman
3.1
How Hickman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 69
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.7%Housing insecurity
6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
13.8%Food insecurity
12.6%SNAP enrollment
8.2%Transit barriers
9.6%No health insurance
17.9%Frequent mental distress
33.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hickman
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 3.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hickman, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Stanislaus County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06099002901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06099002901?
Census tract 06099002901 in Hickman scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06099002901?
Median gross rent is $1,537/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06099002901?
6.0% of residents in tract 06099002901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,103.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06099002901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 78th, minority 51th, housing 58th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06099002901 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06099002901 compare to Hickman overall?
Tract 06099002901 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Hickman at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hickman; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.