Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Hickman Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 06099002901 · Stanislaus, CA · pop 5,103 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Hickman

Hickman in Stanislaus County anchors census tract 06099002901, which lands at 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 14% of US census tracts.

17% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,537 monthly, set against $95,119 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 28% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,614
Renter share34.3%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$95,119

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hickman
Moderate
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#111 of 112 tracts In Stanislaus
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#7,640 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hickman and the region

Centroid at 37.6014, -120.6513 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hickman scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hickman
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,537 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hickman
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hickman
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hickman
3.1

How Hickman compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hickman risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 002901Hickman: 8.28.2Hickmanparent cityCounty: 5.85.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hickman

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 3.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hickman, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Stanislaus County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06099002901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06099002901?

Census tract 06099002901 in Hickman scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06099002901?

Median gross rent is $1,537/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06099002901?

6.0% of residents in tract 06099002901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,103.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06099002901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 78th, minority 51th, housing 58th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06099002901 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06099002901 compare to Hickman overall?

Tract 06099002901 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Hickman at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hickman; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related