Yuba County, California Eviction Risk: Elevated
18 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Linda (7.1) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Yuba County's city scores range from 6 to 7.1, with Marysville anchoring the high end at 7.1/10 and the county averaging 6.8/10 (Elevated) across 18 cities. Ranked 15th out of 58 California counties by eviction risk.
How Yuba County ranks in California
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Linda | 23,871 | 6.9 | 29.5% | $1,211 | Rep |
| 002 | Olivehurst | 18,444 | 6.7 | 29.5% | $1,326 | Rep |
| 003 | Marysville | 12,726 | 7.1 | 32.8% | $1,295 | Rep |
| 004 | Plumas Lake | 9,418 | 6.5 | 33.0% | $2,302 | Rep |
| 005 | Wheatland | 3,876 | 6.0 | 28.6% | $1,264 | Rep |
| 006 | Loma Rica | 2,343 | 6.5 | 18.0% | $1,724 | Rep |
| 007 | Penn Valley | 1,678 | 6.8 | 36.4% | $1,230 | Rep |
| 008 | Beale AFB | 1,344 | 7.0 | 51.0% | $2,758 | Rep |
| 009 | Challenge-Brownsville | 887 | 6.4 | 40.6% | $842 | Rep |
| 010 | Dobbins | 875 | 6.4 | 75.0% | $1,893 | Rep |
| 011 | Bangor | 597 | 6.4 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 012 | Clipper Mills | 414 | 6.9 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 013 | Honcut | 271 | 6.9 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 014 | North San Juan | 179 | 6.9 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 015 | Rackerby | 138 | 6.7 | 23.2% | $1,344 | Rep |
| 016 | Robinson Mill | 100 | 6.3 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 017 | Forbestown | 90 | 6.2 | 34.2% | $1,973 | Rep |
| 018 | Smartsville | 44 | 6.3 | 33.0% | $1,345 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Yuba County scores 6.8/10 (Elevated) on the eviction-risk index, placing it among the higher-risk third of all 58 California eviction laws counties. Only 14 counties in the state carry a worse score, while 43 are measurably more landlord-friendly. For investors assessing a roughly 77,000-person market where 38.3% of households rent at an average of $1,451 per month, that Elevated designation is not a minor caveat. It reflects a combination of financial stress on tenants, a court process that can stretch considerably, and state-level tenant protections that constrain landlord options throughout California eviction laws.
Risk inside the county is not uniform. Scores range from 6 to 7.1 across the 18 cities tracked here, a meaningful 1.1-point spread. A landlord operating in Wheatland faces a noticeably different operating environment than one holding units in Marysville. Understanding that hyper-local variation is where the real due diligence begins.
The cities inside Yuba County
Marysville, the county seat, carries the highest risk score in the county at 7.1/10 and a population of 12,726. That score puts it in genuinely high-risk territory. Beale AFB follows at 7/10, and Linda, the county's most populous community at 23,871 residents, sits at 6.9/10. Clipper Mills, Honcut, and North San Juan also score 6.9/10. Olivehurst, with 18,444 residents, comes in at 6.7/10. These communities together represent most of the county's rental inventory, and their scores reflect concentrated financial pressure on tenants.
The lower end of the range offers some relief. Wheatland scores 6/10, and Plumas Lake and Loma Rica each score 6.5/10. These markets carry less aggregate risk, though they still sit in Elevated territory under California state law. Because individual city conditions vary this much within a single county, landlords considering Yuba County should drill into city-level data before committing capital. The complexity of managing across multiple risk bands is precisely why working with a professional property manager can be worth the cost in a market like this.
State-level laws that apply here
Every landlord in Yuba County operates under California state law regardless of which city their units sit in. For non-payment of rent or a curable lease violation, the required notice period is 3 days under CCP § 1161. No-cause terminations require 30 days notice for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more under Civ. Code § 1946.1. Just-cause no-fault terminations, including owner move-in and substantial remodel, also require 60 days. Under AB 1482 (Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12), most multi-unit buildings built before 2005 are subject to a rent cap of 5% plus CPI, capped at 10% annually, and just-cause eviction requirements apply under CA Civil Code § 1946.2. The California eviction process adds further time pressure: uncontested cases typically resolve in 35 to 60 days, while contested matters can run 75 to 180 days. Landlords should also budget carefully for California eviction costs, which include court filing fees of $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees of $75 to $145, and attorney fees typically running $1,500 to $4,500 depending on case complexity.
With a poverty rate of 15.8% and more than one in three households renting, Yuba County carries real tenant financial vulnerability, a factor that shapes eviction likelihood across all 18 cities in the grid above.
How Yuba County compares
Yuba County's average eviction-risk score of 6.8/10 matches Butte County (6.8/10) and exceeds all other scored peers: El Dorado County (6.6/10), Tehama County (6.6/10), Kings County (6.5/10), and Mendocino County (6.4/10). Within California's 58 counties, Yuba ranks 15th highest, placing it in the top quarter of the state for landlord-side eviction exposure.
Peer counties in California
Where eviction risk concentrates in Yuba County
Top cities by population
Frequently asked questions about Yuba County
What does the 6.8/10 county-average mean?
The 6.8/10 county-average is a population-weighted mean of 18 municipal landlord-risk scores. The internal range is 6 to 7.1.
What share of Yuba County households rent?
About 38.3% of occupied units in Yuba County are renter-occupied, per ACS 2023 5-year data.
How fast is eviction in Yuba County?
Eviction timeline runs at the state level under California eviction laws statute. See the California eviction laws eviction-process guide for state-specific timelines.