Skip to content
Bangor, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 597 residents

Bangor, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Yuba County · Population 597

In 2026
Risk score
6.4
ELEVATED

63th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.2 Average2.8 Now6.4
10 5 1976 · score 1.2 1977 · score 1.3 1978 · score 1.2 1979 · score 1.3 1980 · score 1.3 1981 · score 1.4 1982 · score 1.4 1983 · score 1.4 1984 · score 1.3 1985 · score 1.3 1986 · score 1.3 1987 · score 1.3 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.1 1995 · score 2.1 1996 · score 2.1 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.2 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.5 2006 · score 2.5 2007 · score 2.6 2008 · score 3.4 2009 · score 3.5 2010 · score 3.6 2011 · score 3.7 2012 · score 3.6 2013 · score 3.6 2014 · score 3.7 2015 · score 3.8 2016 · score 4.0 2017 · score 4.1 2018 · score 4.3 2019 · score 4.6 2020 · score 5.4 2021 · score 5.4 2022 · score 5.3 2023 · score 5.3 2024 · score 5.2 2025 · score 5.1 2026 · score 6.4

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 6.8 Economic 4.3 Supply 2.1 Rent Control 5.2 Eviction 6.8 Tenant 2.1 Housing 4.3 6.4 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +25.8% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    5.2% poverty · 3.7% unemp.
    4.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,973 average · 3.6% renters
    2.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    34.2% of income on rent
    5.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    280 days filing → judgment
    6.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    3.6% renters
    2.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bangor and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Bangor compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Yuba County
Low
#12 of 18 cities
Rank in county, 35th percentileBottomTop
#12 of 18 cities in Yuba County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Elevated
#597 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 63rd percentileBottomTop
#597 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Bangor risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Bangor: 6.46.4BangorThis cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.4
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 280d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,973/mo. A contested eviction takes 280 days and costs $16,506-$33,233 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 3.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 597 residents, 3.6% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 5.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +25.8% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.8, housing court bias 4.3, rent-control risk 5.2. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.3. Supply constraint: 2.1. The numbers behind those: 5.2% poverty, 3.7% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Bangor sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Roseville, CA · 266d · ~$28.2k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Roseville Chico, CA · 252d · ~$27.7k all-in ($110/day) · score 6.5 Chico Citrus Heights, CA · 276d · ~$25.3k all-in ($92/day) · score 7.5 Citrus Heights Rocklin, CA · 272d · ~$24.8k all-in ($91/day) · score 6 Rocklin Yuba City, CA · 255d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 6.2 Yuba City Lincoln, CA · 275d · ~$27.7k all-in ($101/day) · score 5.7 Lincoln Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 10 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 6.4 San Diego San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.6 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.9 San Francisco Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Bangor
Bangor · 280d · ~$24.9k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Bangor, CA

Landlording in Bangor, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.4/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Bangor is a city of 597 residents where 3.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 34.2% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,973/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Bangor eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Bangor closes 280 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Bangor's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Bangor runs $16,506 to $33,233 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 280 days of typical timeline and $1,973/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.1/10 in Bangor, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Bangor: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $33,233 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Bangor

Trap · 5.1/10
The 5.1/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Bangor-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Bangor without a reason?

No, not after they've lived in the unit for 12 months. California has a statewide "just-cause" eviction requirement. You need a legally recognized reason, like non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific no-fault reasons with proper notice and potentially relocation assistance.

Q2

How long does an eviction typically take in Bangor, CA?

Our data shows a typical eviction timeline of 280 days in Bangor, CA. This is a long process due to California's tenant protections and court procedures. Be prepared for it to take nearly a year from start to finish.

Q3

What is the maximum security deposit I can charge in Bangor?

In Bangor, like the rest of California, the security deposit cap is 1.00 month's rent. This is a strict limit, and you cannot charge more, regardless of credit score or other factors.

Q4

Should I use a lawyer for an eviction in Bangor?

Absolutely. Given the complexity of California's landlord-tenant laws and the high costs and long timelines associated with evictions here, attempting a DIY eviction is a significant risk. A knowledgeable attorney will ensure you follow all procedures correctly, saving you time and money in the long run.

Q5

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the eviction is finalized?

Once you have a judgment of possession from the court, you will need to involve the Yuba County Sheriff's Department to perform a legal lockout. You cannot physically remove the tenant yourself. The sheriff will serve a final notice and then physically remove the tenant if they still refuse to leave.

Q6

Is "cash for keys" a good option in Bangor?

Yes, "cash for keys" is often a very practical and cost-effective solution in Bangor. With evictions taking 280 days and costing upwards of $16,000, offering a tenant money to move out quickly and voluntarily can significantly reduce your overall losses and stress. Always get the agreement in writing.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.4/10 places Bangor in the 63rd percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.