Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

Parker Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12005000900 · Bay, FL · pop 4,208 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Parker

In Parker, census tract 12005000900 scores 5.1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 43% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,217 a month while the average household earns $68,454 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 18% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,798
Renter share39.1%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate2.8%
Median income$68,454

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Parker
Moderate
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 49 tracts In Bay
Very Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#3,967 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
National
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#68,306 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Parker and the region

Centroid at 30.1272, -85.6015 · click any tract to drill in

Why Parker scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Parker
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
2.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,217 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Parker
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Parker
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Parker
4.8

How Parker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Parker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 000900Parker: 2.22.2Parkerparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 529Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 7.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.4%Peak (2016)
  • 76Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120050009002008: 39 filings (4.91/100 renter HHs)2010: 14 filings (1.91/100 renter HHs)2011: 44 filings (6.21/100 renter HHs)2012: 46 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)2013: 48 filings (6.78/100 renter HHs)2014: 64 filings (9.04/100 renter HHs)2015: 64 filings (9.04/100 renter HHs)2016: 78 filings (11.42/100 renter HHs)2017: 56 filings (8.20/100 renter HHs)2018: 76 filings (11.13/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 95% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Parker

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Parker, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bay County average of 5.0 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 529 eviction filings here over 10 tracked years, with about 7.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.4% of renter households in 2016.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12005000900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12005000900?

Census tract 12005000900 in Parker scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12005000900?

Median gross rent is $1,217/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12005000900?

2.8% of residents in tract 12005000900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,208.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12005000900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 47th, minority 40th, housing 63th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12005000900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 529 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 12005000900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.51% of renter households, peaking at 11.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 12005000900 compare to Parker overall?

Tract 12005000900 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Parker at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Parker; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related