Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally

Mango Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 12057012107 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,589 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 12057012107 covers part of the Mango Hills area of Mango, FL, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,589 residents. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 17% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,996
Renter share41.3%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate18.6%
Median income$44,430

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Mango Hills
Very High
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Mango
Very Low
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#259 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mango and the region

Centroid at 27.9914, -82.2920 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mango Hills scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mango
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.6% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,199 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mango
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mango
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mango
8.2

How Mango Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mango Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.8This tracttract 0121074.4Mangoparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 658Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 9.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.8%Peak (2001)
  • 48Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 12057012107
Filings dropped 46% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 240Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mango Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mango Hills

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.1/10. The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Set annual rent against average income of $44,430 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. It sits 1.6 points above the Hillsborough County average of 4.2.

Cost burden runs 59% here against 51.5% across Hillsborough County. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. The filing record is not thin: 658 evictions over 11 years of observation.

Adults with no health insurance runs 18.6% against 11.3% nationally. The worst year on record was 2001, when 14.8% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 9.2% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.8/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057012107

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057012107?

Census tract 12057012107 in the Mango Hills neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057012107?

Median gross rent is $1,199/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057012107?

18.6% of residents in tract 12057012107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,589.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057012107?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 73th, minority 66th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 12057012107 considered part of Mango Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057012107 fall within Mango Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057012107?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 658 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057012107 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.15% of renter households, peaking at 14.8% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057012107 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057012107 compare to Mango overall?

Tract 12057012107 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Mango at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mango; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mango

Top eight tracts in Mango ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related