Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Mango Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 12057012109 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 2,826
Tract 12057012109 sits in Mango, FL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. Population here is 2,826. Severe burden reaches 38%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43%
Stable renters 35%
Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,389
Renter share77.6%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate30.3%
Median income$44,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
97
th percentile
Very High
Within state
95
th percentile
Very High
National
76
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mango and the region
Centroid at 27.9778, -82.3238 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mango scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mango
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
30.3% poverty · this tract
7.6
Supply constraint
$1,172 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mango
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mango
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mango
8.2
How Mango compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 613Total filings 2020-21
- 8.4Avg monthly (observed)
- 5.7Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.47×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mango
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.
78% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Against the Hillsborough County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.6 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 24.6% against 11.3% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,172, 8% below the Mango average. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the FL average is 4.1, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 12057012109
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057012109?
Census tract 12057012109 in Mango scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12057012109?
Median gross rent is $1,172/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12057012109?
30.3% of residents in tract 12057012109 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,826.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12057012109?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 96th, minority 81th, housing 70th.
Q5
Did eviction filings in tract 12057012109 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q6
How does tract 12057012109 compare to Mango overall?
Tract 12057012109 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Mango at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mango; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mango
Top eight tracts in Mango ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related