Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Rattlesnake Eviction Risk: Lower , Tampa

Tract 12057007102 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,114 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

In the Rattlesnake area of Tampa, census tract 12057007102 scores 4.7/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 30th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,197 monthly, set against $100,147 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 80% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 41% Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units2,544
Renter share80.0%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$100,147

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Rattlesnake
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#83 of 104 tracts In Tampa
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#217 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#3,043 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 27.8895, -82.5302 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rattlesnake scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,197 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Rattlesnake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rattlesnake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 007102Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 354Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 10.41%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.0%Peak (2002)
  • 34Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570071022000: 48 filings (21.64/100 renter HHs)2001: 38 filings (17.13/100 renter HHs)2002: 51 filings (22.99/100 renter HHs)2003: 15 filings (6.76/100 renter HHs)2004: 22 filings (9.92/100 renter HHs)2005: 28 filings (11.84/100 renter HHs)2009: 33 filings (13.95/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (1.82/100 renter HHs)2011: 32 filings (2.71/100 renter HHs)2015: 31 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2016: 34 filings (3.10/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 146Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.30×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-09-01: 7 filings (4.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rattlesnake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rattlesnake

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057007102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057007102?

Census tract 12057007102 in the Rattlesnake neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057007102?

Median gross rent is $2,197/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057007102?

6.5% of residents in tract 12057007102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,114.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057007102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 14th, minority 53th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 12057007102 considered part of Rattlesnake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057007102 fall within Rattlesnake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057007102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 354 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057007102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.41% of renter households, peaking at 23.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057007102 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.30× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057007102 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057007102 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057007102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related