Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Candler-McAfee Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 13089023505 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 2,991

Census tract 13089023505 runs through Candler-McAfee. With 2,991 residents, it scores 6.3/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 51% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,393 monthly, set against $73,304 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 10% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units903
Renter share21.0%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$73,304

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Candler-McAfee
Very Low
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#1,772 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#58,384 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Candler-McAfee and the region

Centroid at 33.7240, -84.2589 · click any tract to drill in

Why Candler-McAfee scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,393 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Candler-McAfee
6.9

How Candler-McAfee compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Candler-McAfee risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 023505Candler-McAfee: 3.03.0Candler-McAfeeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 584Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 27.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 34.2%Peak (2015)
  • 84Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890235052004: 40 filings (24.10/100 renter HHs)2007: 74 filings (29.60/100 renter HHs)2011: 70 filings (26.62/100 renter HHs)2012: 71 filings (27.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 72 filings (27.38/100 renter HHs)2014: 83 filings (31.56/100 renter HHs)2015: 90 filings (34.22/100 renter HHs)2016: 84 filings (21.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 110% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 350Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Candler-McAfee

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 584 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 27.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 34.2% of renter households in 2015.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023505?

Census tract 13089023505 in Candler-McAfee scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023505?

Median gross rent is $1,393/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023505?

3.1% of residents in tract 13089023505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,991.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 75th, minority 92th, housing 14th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 584 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 27.73% of renter households, peaking at 34.2% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13089023505 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13089023505 compare to Candler-McAfee overall?

Tract 13089023505 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Candler-McAfee at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Candler-McAfee eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Candler-McAfee

Top eight tracts in Candler-McAfee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related