Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Stone Mill Run Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tucker

Tract 13089021913 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 4,189 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

With a score of 5.7/10, tract 13089021913 in the Stone Mill Run area of Tucker, GA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,189. The severe-burden share is 45%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 68% Stable renters 23% Owners 9%
Tract context
Occupied units1,976
Renter share91.0%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate37.5%
Median income$33,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Stone Mill Run
Moderate
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 18 tracts In Tucker
Very High
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#37 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#210 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucker and the region

Centroid at 33.8266, -84.1835 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stone Mill Run scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucker
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
37.5% poverty · this tract
9.4
Supply constraint
$1,293 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucker
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucker
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucker
7.3

How Stone Mill Run compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stone Mill Run risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.7This tracttract 0219134.3Tuckerparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 9,129Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 97.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 207.1%Peak (2007)
  • 974Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089021913
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 5,415Total filings 2020-21
  • 71.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stone Mill Run

Against DeKalb County at 52.2%, roughly three in four of renters here are cost-burdened. Food insecurity runs 48.5% against 17.8% nationally.

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.7/10. Annualized rent equals 47% of average household income of $33,000, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 30.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. 91% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Running hot, economic stress reads 9.4/10.

The poverty rate is 38%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10.

At $1,293 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Tucker commands. Against the DeKalb County average of 4.5, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. The filing record is not thin: 9,129 evictions over 8 years of observation.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021913

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021913?

Census tract 13089021913 in the Stone Mill Run neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021913?

Median gross rent is $1,293/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021913?

37.5% of residents in tract 13089021913 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,189.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021913?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 70th, minority 89th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021913 considered part of Stone Mill Run?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021913 fall within Stone Mill Run (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021913?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9,129 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021913 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 97.88% of renter households, peaking at 207.1% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021913 struggle to pay rent?

About 38.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021913 compare to Tucker overall?

Tract 13089021913 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Tucker at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucker

Top eight tracts in Tucker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related