Census Tract · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Dacula Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13135050623 ·
Gwinnett County, GA · pop 5,940 · 26% of tract blocks fall in Dacula
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 13135050623 (Dacula in Gwinnett County, Georgia) comes in at 5.1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 43% of US census tracts.
10% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 1% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,141 monthly, set against $82,036 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 13%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,950
Renter share14.4%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$82,036
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33th percentile
#3 of 4 tracts In Dacula
Low
Within county
29th percentile
#156 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Low
Within state
17th percentile
#2,326 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
National
14th percentile
#72,539 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Dacula and the region
Centroid at 33.9632, -83.8667 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dacula scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dacula
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,141 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dacula
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dacula
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dacula
6.7
How Dacula compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
54%Socioeconomic
93%Household composition
70%Racial/ethnic minority
2%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
291Total filings 2020-21
3.8Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
14.5%Housing insecurity
8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
14.9%Food insecurity
10.3%SNAP enrollment
8.2%Transit barriers
13.2%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
25.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dacula
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dacula, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and below the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050623
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050623?
Census tract 13135050623 in Dacula scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050623?
Median gross rent is $2,141/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050623?
2.5% of residents in tract 13135050623 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,940.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050623?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 93th, minority 70th, housing 2th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 13135050623 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 13135050623 compare to Dacula overall?
Tract 13135050623 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Dacula at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dacula; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Dacula
Top eight tracts in Dacula ranked by composite eviction-risk score.