Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Chattawood Eviction Risk: Lower , Duluth

Tract 13135050205 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 5,039 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

In Chattawood in Duluth, census tract 13135050205 scores 5.6/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 62% of US census tracts.

About 38% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,751 monthly, set against $97,041 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 51% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 32% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,950
Renter share50.8%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$97,041

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Chattawood
Very Low
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 12 tracts In Duluth
Low
Within county
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#170 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,428 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Duluth and the region

Centroid at 34.0129, -84.1636 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chattawood scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Duluth
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,751 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Duluth
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Duluth
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Duluth
4.6

How Chattawood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chattawood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 050205Duluth: 2.52.5Duluthparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,598Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 20.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 32.0%Peak (2015)
  • 200Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 131350502052001: 151 filings (16.18/100 renter HHs)2003: 128 filings (13.71/100 renter HHs)2004: 113 filings (12.11/100 renter HHs)2009: 197 filings (21.11/100 renter HHs)2010: 134 filings (18.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 178 filings (20.55/100 renter HHs)2013: 220 filings (25.40/100 renter HHs)2015: 277 filings (31.99/100 renter HHs)2016: 200 filings (22.25/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 32% over the past 9 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 761Total filings 2020-21
  • 10.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chattawood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chattawood

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Duluth eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,598 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 20.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 32.0% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13135050205

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050205?

Census tract 13135050205 in the Chattawood neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13135050205?

Median gross rent is $1,751/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050205?

3.8% of residents in tract 13135050205 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,039.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050205?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 36th, minority 80th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 13135050205 considered part of Chattawood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050205 fall within Chattawood (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13135050205?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,598 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 13135050205 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.21% of renter households, peaking at 32.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13135050205 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13135050205 compare to Duluth overall?

Tract 13135050205 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Duluth at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Duluth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Duluth

Top eight tracts in Duluth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related