Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

Chattawood Eviction Risk: Lower , Duluth

Tract 13135050219 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 4,288 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 13135050219 runs through the Chattawood area of Duluth. With 4,288 residents, it scores 5.9/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #23,396 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,493 monthly, set against $94,677 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 23% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,750
Renter share41.3%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$94,677

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Chattawood
Moderate
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 12 tracts In Duluth
Moderate
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#128 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Moderate
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#2,156 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Duluth and the region

Centroid at 33.9955, -84.1556 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chattawood scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Duluth
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,493 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Duluth
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Duluth
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Duluth
4.6

How Chattawood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chattawood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 050219Duluth: 2.52.5Duluthparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 606Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 15.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.5%Peak (2015)
  • 78Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 131350502192001: 55 filings (11.09/100 renter HHs)2003: 76 filings (15.33/100 renter HHs)2004: 57 filings (11.50/100 renter HHs)2009: 63 filings (14.16/100 renter HHs)2010: 73 filings (17.63/100 renter HHs)2012: 58 filings (13.84/100 renter HHs)2013: 60 filings (14.32/100 renter HHs)2015: 86 filings (20.53/100 renter HHs)2016: 78 filings (16.81/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 42% over the past 9 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 343Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chattawood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chattawood

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Duluth eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 13135050219

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050219?

Census tract 13135050219 in the Chattawood neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13135050219?

Median gross rent is $1,493/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050219?

9.5% of residents in tract 13135050219 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,288.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050219?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 51th, minority 76th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 13135050219 considered part of Chattawood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050219 fall within Chattawood (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13135050219?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 606 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 13135050219 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.02% of renter households, peaking at 20.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13135050219 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13135050219 compare to Duluth overall?

Tract 13135050219 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Duluth at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Duluth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Duluth

Top eight tracts in Duluth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related