Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Sugar Hill Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 13135050116 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 8,107 · 37% of tract blocks fall in Sugar Hill

Tract 13135050116 sits in Sugar Hill eviction risk, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 8,107 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 4% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units2,285
Renter share8.0%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$146,540

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Sugar Hill
Low
Within county
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#208 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Hill and the region

Centroid at 34.0995, -84.0968 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sugar Hill scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,405 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Hill
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Hill
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.7

How Sugar Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sugar Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0501163.8Sugar Hillparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 44Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sugar Hill

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. The voucher gap is 31.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Average gross rent is $2,405, 29% above the Sugar Hill average.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10. It sits 1.1 points below the Gwinnett County average of 4.1. SNAP participation runs 5.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 54% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13135050116

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050116?

Census tract 13135050116 in Sugar Hill scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13135050116?

Median gross rent is $2,405/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050116?

2.2% of residents in tract 13135050116 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,107.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050116?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 47th, minority 58th, housing 10th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 13135050116 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 13135050116 compare to Sugar Hill overall?

Tract 13135050116 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Sugar Hill at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Hill eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Hill

Top eight tracts in Sugar Hill ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related