Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

The Oaks at Lanier Eviction Risk: Lower , Sugar Hill

Tract 13135050117 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 3,814 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 13135050117 covers part of the The Oaks at Lanier area of Sugar Hill, GA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,814. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 4% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,290
Renter share12.6%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate1.1%
Median income$125,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In The Oaks at Lanier
Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Sugar Hill
Moderate
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#216 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Very Low
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,121 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sugar Hill and the region

Centroid at 34.1087, -84.0668 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Oaks at Lanier scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
1.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,913 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Hill
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Hill
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.7

How The Oaks at Lanier compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Oaks at Lanier risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0501173.8Sugar Hillparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 69Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Oaks at Lanier. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Oaks at Lanier

31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. 67% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Gwinnett County average of 52.0%.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.3/10.

Against the Gwinnett County average of 4.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points. SNAP participation runs 6.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10.

Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13135050117

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050117?

Census tract 13135050117 in the The Oaks at Lanier neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13135050117?

Median gross rent is $1,913/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050117?

1.1% of residents in tract 13135050117 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,814.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050117?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 37th, minority 59th, housing 0th.
Q5

Is tract 13135050117 considered part of The Oaks at Lanier?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050117 fall within The Oaks at Lanier (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13135050117 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13135050117 compare to Sugar Hill overall?

Tract 13135050117 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Sugar Hill at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Hill eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Hill

Top eight tracts in Sugar Hill ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related