Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Sugar Hill Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 13135050239 · Gwinnett County, GA · pop 5,110 · 27% of tract blocks fall in Sugar Hill
Census tract 13135050239 covers part of Sugar Hill, GA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,110. The severe-burden share is 52%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,453
Renter share6.3%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$167,635
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
24
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sugar Hill and the region
Centroid at 34.0730, -84.0390 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sugar Hill scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,500 rent vs county FMR
8.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sugar Hill
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sugar Hill
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sugar Hill
6.7
How Sugar Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 13
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 74%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 67Total filings 2020-21
- 0.9Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.2%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 12.1%Frequent mental distress
- 18.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sugar Hill
Against Gwinnett County at 52.0%, about three-quarters of renters here are cost-burdened. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.
The voucher gap is 36.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. At $2,500 a month, rents run 34% over what the rest of Sugar Hill commands.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.7/10. Disability prevalence runs 18.2% against 31.5% nationally.
Against the Gwinnett County average of 4.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points. Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.1/10.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050239
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050239?
Census tract 13135050239 in Sugar Hill scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050239?
Median gross rent is $2,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050239?
2.6% of residents in tract 13135050239 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,110.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050239?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 50th, minority 74th, housing 1th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 13135050239 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 13135050239 compare to Sugar Hill overall?
Tract 13135050239 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Sugar Hill at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sugar Hill eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sugar Hill
Top eight tracts in Sugar Hill ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · GA
Frontier Forest
3.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
13135050119
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
13135050120
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
13135050116
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · GA
The Oaks at Lanier
3
/ 10 · Low
Related