Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Carver Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 13215002800 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 1,959 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 13215002800 sits in the Carver Heights area of Columbus eviction risk, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. Population here is 1,959. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 42% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units936
Renter share78.1%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate29.0%
Median income$28,056

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Carver Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#6 of 59 tracts In Columbus
Very High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 59 tracts In Muscogee County
Very High
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#681 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 32.4589, -84.9510 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carver Heights scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
29.0% poverty · this tract
7.2
Supply constraint
$713 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.0

How Carver Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carver Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0028003.6Columbusparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carver Heights

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Average gross rent is $713, 36% below the Columbus average. 78% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.9% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 29%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 22.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2/10. It sits 0.9 points above the Muscogee County average of 4.1.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 9.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13215002800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215002800?

Census tract 13215002800 in the Carver Heights neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13215002800?

Median gross rent is $713/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13215002800?

29.0% of residents in tract 13215002800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,959.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13215002800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 75th, minority 96th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 13215002800 considered part of Carver Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13215002800 fall within Carver Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13215002800 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13215002800 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 13215002800 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13215002800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related