Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally

Smith Residential Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 13215011100 · Muscogee County, GA · pop 1,775 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 4.3/10, tract 13215011100 in the Smith Residential Historic District area of Columbus, GA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,775 residents. The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 51% Owners 20%
Tract context
Occupied units835
Renter share80.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate24.4%
Median income$58,184

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Smith Residential Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#29 of 59 tracts In Columbus
Moderate
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#29 of 59 tracts In Muscogee County
Moderate
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,146 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 32.4714, -84.9882 · click any tract to drill in

Why Smith Residential Historic District scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
24.4% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$988 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
3.0

How Smith Residential Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Smith Residential Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.3This tracttract 0111003.6Columbusparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Smith Residential Historic District

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 80% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Cost burden runs 36% here against 44.6% across Muscogee County.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2/10. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.7/10. SNAP participation runs 23.6% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 26.2% against 17.8% nationally. At $988 a month, rents run 11% under what the rest of Columbus commands. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Columbus. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #44,239 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.1/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13215011100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13215011100?

Census tract 13215011100 in the Smith Residential Historic District neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13215011100?

Median gross rent is $988/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13215011100?

24.4% of residents in tract 13215011100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,775.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13215011100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 8th, minority 64th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 13215011100 considered part of Smith Residential Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13215011100 fall within Smith Residential Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13215011100 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13215011100 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 13215011100 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 13215011100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 38% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related