Canaryville Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031611200 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,072 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Tract 17031611200 sits in the Canaryville area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.1/10. Population here is 2,072. The severe-burden share is 43%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8050, -87.6624 · click any tract to drill in
Why Canaryville scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Canaryville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 97
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 91%Household composition
- 92%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 401Total filings over 15 yrs
- 5.33%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.8%Peak (2004)
- 21Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Canaryville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.4%Housing insecurity
- 18.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 41.6%Food insecurity
- 35.7%SNAP enrollment
- 18.5%Transit barriers
- 29.2%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 36.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Canaryville
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9/10. SNAP participation runs 35.7% against 15.2% nationally.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. The poverty rate is 36%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Against Cook County at 45.6%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.
At $993 a month, rents run 31% under what the rest of Chicago commands. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
The filing record is not thin: 401 evictions over 15 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2004, when 6.8% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031611200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031611200?
What is the average rent in tract 17031611200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031611200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031611200?
Is tract 17031611200 considered part of Canaryville?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031611200?
What share of households in tract 17031611200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031611200 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031611200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.