Tract 17031835500 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 1,393 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 17031835500 covers part of the Canaryville area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,393. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 44%Stable renters 31%Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units697
Renter share74.7%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate49.4%
Median income$20,669
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
88th percentile
#3 of 18 tracts In Canaryville
High
Within parent city
86th percentile
#116 of 792 tracts In Chicago
High
Within county
82th percentile
#244 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100th percentile
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8164, -87.6325 · click any tract to drill in
Why Canaryville scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
49.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$553 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Canaryville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
92%Socioeconomic
90%Household composition
96%Racial/ethnic minority
80%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
73%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
488Total filings over 15 yrs
6.17%Avg annual filing rate
9.3%Peak (2012)
36Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Canaryville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
38.3%Housing insecurity
30.4%Utility-shutoff threat
53.6%Food insecurity
61.2%SNAP enrollment
25.6%Transit barriers
17.8%No health insurance
19.7%Frequent mental distress
46.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Canaryville
At $553 a month, rents run 62% under what the rest of Chicago commands. Housing insecurity runs 38.3% against 14.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 49%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 30.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Cook County average of 45.6%. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1.
22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. 75% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Set annual rent against average income of $20,669 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031835500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031835500?
Census tract 17031835500 in the Canaryville neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031835500?
Median gross rent is $553/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031835500?
49.4% of residents in tract 17031835500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,393.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031835500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 90th, minority 96th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 17031835500 considered part of Canaryville?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031835500 fall within Canaryville (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031835500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 488 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031835500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.17% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031835500 struggle to pay rent?
About 38.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031835500 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031835500 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031835500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 73% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.