Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Clarendon Park Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031031501 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,640 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Tract 17031031501 sits in the Clarendon Park area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.1/10. It is home to 4,640 residents. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42%
Stable renters 40%
Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units2,084
Renter share81.5%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate45.8%
Median income$51,731
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
82
th percentile
High
Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9673, -87.6524 · click any tract to drill in
Why Clarendon Park scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
45.8% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,086 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Clarendon Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 86%Socioeconomic
- 89%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 739Total filings over 15 yrs
- 3.81%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.6%Peak (2002)
- 43Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Clarendon Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.2%Housing insecurity
- 17.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.3%Food insecurity
- 35.8%SNAP enrollment
- 16.6%Transit barriers
- 14.9%No health insurance
- 18.5%Frequent mental distress
- 34.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Clarendon Park
The poverty rate is 46%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. This is renter territory: 81% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.2/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,086, 25% below the Chicago average. Housing insecurity runs 24.2% against 14.2% nationally.
Against Cook County at 45.6%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened. Court records carry 739 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2002, when 5.6% of renter households were served.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031031501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031031501?
Census tract 17031031501 in the Clarendon Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031031501?
Median gross rent is $1,086/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031031501?
45.8% of residents in tract 17031031501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,640.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031031501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 89th, minority 76th, housing 96th.
Q5
Is tract 17031031501 considered part of Clarendon Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031031501 fall within Clarendon Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031031501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 739 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031031501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.81% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031031501 struggle to pay rent?
About 24.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031031501 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031031501 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031031501 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
West Roseland
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Becks Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Trumbull Park Homes
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Park Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Marquette Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Windsor Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Marquette Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related