Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Gano Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031530200 · Cook County, IL · pop 4,358 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 17031530200 in the Gano area of Chicago, IL reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,358. Severe burden reaches 54%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,421
Renter share55.4%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate20.8%
Median income$39,579
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.6816, -87.6324 · click any tract to drill in
Why Gano scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
20.8% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$1,453 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Gano compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 47%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 78%Grade C
- 21%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,000Total filings over 15 yrs
- 8.83%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.3%Peak (2001)
- 56Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 37% over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.1%Housing insecurity
- 21.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.3%Food insecurity
- 41.5%SNAP enrollment
- 18.6%Transit barriers
- 11.9%No health insurance
- 19.0%Frequent mental distress
- 36.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Gano
SNAP participation runs 41.5% against 15.2% nationally. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened. Set annual rent against average income of $39,579 and the ratio lands at 44%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. Housing insecurity runs 31.1% against 14.2% nationally.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,000 filings here across 15 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 11.3% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 8.8% of renter households face a filing.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031530200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031530200?
Census tract 17031530200 in the Gano neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031530200?
Median gross rent is $1,453/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031530200?
20.8% of residents in tract 17031530200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,358.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031530200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 85th, minority 96th, housing 47th.
Q5
Is tract 17031530200 considered part of Gano?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031530200 fall within Gano (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031530200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,000 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031530200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.83% of renter households, peaking at 11.3% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031530200 struggle to pay rent?
About 31.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031530200 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031530200 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031530200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 21% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Brookdale
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Irondale
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Grand Crossing
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Moreland
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Bryn Mawr West
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Chester Highlands
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Park Manor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Ellsworth
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related