Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally

Smith Park Eviction Risk: High , Chicago

Tract 17031836700 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,507 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

17031836700 is a census tract in the Smith Park area of Chicago, IL. It scores 8.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,507 residents. Food insecurity runs 44.1% against 17.8% nationally.

Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 38% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,042
Renter share77.4%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate21.0%
Median income$47,439

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Smith Park
Very High
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#248 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#250 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.8917, -87.7022 · click any tract to drill in

Why Smith Park scores 8.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
21.0% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,279 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Smith Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Smith Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.18.1This tracttract 836700Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 613Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 7.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.3%Peak (2015)
  • 64Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318367002001: 35 filings (7.38/100 renter HHs)2002: 29 filings (6.12/100 renter HHs)2003: 44 filings (9.28/100 renter HHs)2004: 37 filings (7.81/100 renter HHs)2005: 28 filings (4.67/100 renter HHs)2006: 42 filings (7.01/100 renter HHs)2007: 25 filings (4.17/100 renter HHs)2008: 35 filings (5.84/100 renter HHs)2009: 41 filings (6.84/100 renter HHs)2010: 41 filings (7.11/100 renter HHs)2011: 46 filings (8.86/100 renter HHs)2012: 47 filings (9.06/100 renter HHs)2013: 48 filings (9.25/100 renter HHs)2014: 51 filings (9.83/100 renter HHs)2015: 64 filings (12.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 83% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Smith Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Smith Park

Housing insecurity runs 34.6% against 14.2% nationally. The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10. This is renter territory: 77% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. It sits 2.0 points above the Cook County average of 6.1.

Annualized rent equals 32% of average household income of $47,439, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.3/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. roughly one in two of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Cook County average of 45.6%.

The filing record is not thin: 613 evictions over 15 years of observation. At $1,279 a month, rents run 11% under what the rest of Chicago commands.

Filings peaked in 2015 at 12.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031836700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031836700?

Census tract 17031836700 in the Smith Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031836700?

Median gross rent is $1,279/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031836700?

21.0% of residents in tract 17031836700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,507.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031836700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 72th, minority 96th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 17031836700 considered part of Smith Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031836700 fall within Smith Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031836700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 613 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031836700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.70% of renter households, peaking at 12.3% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031836700 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031836700 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031836700 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031836700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 13% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related