Skip to content
Crescent City, Illinois eviction risk overview
City brief · 456 residents

Crescent City, IL Eviction Risk: LOW

Iroquois County · Population 456

In 2026
Risk score
3.2
LOW

26th percentile, Illinois.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average2.5 Now3.2
10 5 1976 · score 1.3 1977 · score 1.3 1978 · score 1.3 1979 · score 1.3 1980 · score 1.4 1981 · score 1.4 1982 · score 1.4 1983 · score 1.4 1984 · score 1.4 1985 · score 1.3 1986 · score 1.3 1987 · score 1.3 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 2.0 1993 · score 2.0 1994 · score 2.0 1995 · score 2.0 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.2 1999 · score 2.3 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.7 2002 · score 2.7 2003 · score 2.7 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.6 2006 · score 2.6 2007 · score 2.7 2008 · score 3.3 2009 · score 3.5 2010 · score 3.5 2011 · score 3.5 2012 · score 3.1 2013 · score 3.1 2014 · score 3.2 2015 · score 3.3 2016 · score 3.2 2017 · score 3.3 2018 · score 3.4 2019 · score 3.5 2020 · score 4.0 2021 · score 4.0 2022 · score 3.9 2023 · score 4.0 2024 · score 3.9 2025 · score 3.7 2026 · score 3.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.9 Regional 2.9 State 5.2 Economic 4.3 Supply 2.9 Rent Control 4.1 Eviction 4.7 Tenant 2.2 Housing 3.3 3.2 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +57.3% (2024)
    2.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.9
  3. State political climate
    Illinois legislature & governorship
    5.2
  4. Economic stress
    13.1% poverty · 7.0% unemp.
    4.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $817 average · 14.0% renters
    2.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.5% of income on rent
    4.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    116 days filing → judgment
    4.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.0% renters
    2.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crescent City and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Crescent City compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Iroquois County
Very Low
#16 of 19 cities
Rank in county, 17th percentileBottomTop
#16 of 19 cities in Iroquois County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Illinois
Low
#1089 of 1,456 cities
Rank in state, 25th percentileBottomTop
#1089 of 1,456 cities in Illinois for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Crescent City risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Crescent City: 3.23.2Crescent CityThis cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg in countyState: 5.45.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.2
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 116d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $817/mo. A contested eviction takes 116 days and costs $4,373-$13,748 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 456 residents, 14.0% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.9 and 2.9 (GOP margin +57.3% (2024)). State climate at 5.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.7, housing court bias 3.3, rent-control risk 4.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.3. Supply constraint: 2.9. The numbers behind those: 13.1% poverty, 7.0% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Crescent City sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago Aurora, IL · 120d · ~$10.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 5.1 Aurora Naperville, IL · 115d · ~$9.2k all-in ($80/day) · score 4.7 Naperville Joliet, IL · 114d · ~$8.4k all-in ($73/day) · score 4.7 Joliet Rockford, IL · 112d · ~$8.5k all-in ($76/day) · score 4.8 Rockford Elgin, IL · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($77/day) · score 5 Elgin Springfield, IL · 129d · ~$9.3k all-in ($72/day) · score 5 Springfield Peoria, IL · 129d · ~$10.1k all-in ($79/day) · score 4.3 Peoria Champaign, IL · 118d · ~$8.9k all-in ($75/day) · score 5.2 Champaign Waukegan, IL · 116d · ~$9.0k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.9 Waukegan Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Crescent City
Crescent City · 116d · ~$9.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 3.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Crescent City, IL

Landlording in Crescent City, Illinois, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.2/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Crescent City is a city of 456 residents where 14.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $817/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Crescent City eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Crescent City closes 116 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Crescent City's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Crescent City runs $4,373 to $13,748 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 116 days of typical timeline and $817/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.2/10 in Crescent City, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Illinois, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Crescent City: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Illinois's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $13,748 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Crescent City

Trap · 4.1/10
The 3.7/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Crescent City's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.1/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give the 5-day notice?

If your tenant pays only a partial amount within the 5-day notice period, it's generally best not to accept it unless you want to restart the notice period. Accepting partial payment can be seen as waiving your right to evict based on that specific notice. If you accept it, you might need to issue a new 5-day notice for the remaining balance.
Q2

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant isn't paying rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings (self-help eviction) is illegal in Illinois. It can lead to serious penalties, including financial damages to the tenant, even if they owe you rent. Always follow the legal eviction process.
Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Crescent City?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in Illinois, but it's highly recommended, especially if you're new to the process or if the tenant contests the eviction. Mistakes in paperwork or procedure can cause significant delays and cost you more in the long run.
Q4

What if the tenant damages the property during the eviction?

You can pursue damages for property damage in a separate small claims court action after the eviction is complete and you regain possession. The eviction lawsuit itself is primarily about regaining possession of the property. Document all damage with photos and estimates.
Q5

Are there any specific tenant protections in Iroquois County?

While Iroquois County doesn't have unique protections beyond state law, Illinois statewide does have source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher or other non-wage income. For more details on state-level protections, see our Illinois tenant protections guide.
Q6

What about rent control in Crescent City?

There is no rent control in Crescent City or anywhere else in Illinois. Illinois has a statewide ban on rent control. This means you are generally free to set market rates for rent. You can read more on this at our Illinois rent control rules page.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.2/10 places Crescent City in the 26th percentile of Illinois cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.