Skip to content
Netawaka, Kansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 151 residents

Netawaka, KS Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Jackson County · Population 151

In 2026
Risk score
1.9
VERY LOW

30th percentile, Kansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.3 Average1.7 Now1.9
2.8 1.3 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.7 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.7 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.3 1986 · score 1.3 1987 · score 1.3 1988 · score 1.3 1989 · score 1.3 1990 · score 1.4 1991 · score 1.4 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.7 1994 · score 1.7 1995 · score 1.7 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.6 1998 · score 1.5 1999 · score 1.5 2000 · score 1.5 2001 · score 1.6 2002 · score 1.6 2003 · score 1.6 2004 · score 1.6 2005 · score 1.6 2006 · score 1.5 2007 · score 1.5 2008 · score 1.8 2009 · score 1.9 2010 · score 2.0 2011 · score 2.0 2012 · score 1.8 2013 · score 1.8 2014 · score 1.7 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 1.6 2017 · score 1.7 2018 · score 1.7 2019 · score 1.7 2020 · score 2.6 2021 · score 2.8 2022 · score 2.0 2023 · score 2.0 2024 · score 1.8 2025 · score 1.9 2026 · score 1.9

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.7 Regional 3.7 State 2.0 Economic 3.7 Supply 4.4 Rent Control 1.7 Eviction 2.2 Tenant 3.3 Housing 4.0 1.9 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +42.6% (2024)
    3.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.7
  3. State political climate
    Kansas legislature & governorship
    2.0
  4. Economic stress
    13.3% poverty · 3.6% unemp.
    3.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $900 average · 17.0% renters
    4.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.3% of income on rent
    1.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    40 days filing → judgment
    2.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    17.0% renters
    3.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Netawaka and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Netawaka compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Jackson County
Low
#8 of 10 cities
Rank in county, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 10 cities in Jackson County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kansas
Low
#572 of 740 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#572 of 740 cities in Kansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Netawaka risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Netawaka: 1.91.9NetawakaThis cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.9
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 40d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $900/mo. A contested eviction takes 40 days and costs $1,210–$3,650 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 17.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 151 residents, 17.0% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.7 and 3.7 (GOP margin +42.6% (2024)). State climate at 2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.2, housing court bias 4, rent-control risk 1.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.7. Supply constraint: 4.4. The numbers behind those: 13.3% poverty, 3.6% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Netawaka sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Topeka, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.4 Topeka Wichita, KS · 39d · ~$2.5k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Wichita Overland Park, KS · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.1 Overland Park Kansas City, KS · 40d · ~$4.1k all-in ($101/day) · score 2.7 Kansas City Olathe, KS · 40d · ~$2.2k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.1 Olathe Lawrence, KS · 36d · ~$2.5k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.7 Lawrence Shawnee, KS · 34d · ~$2.3k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.1 Shawnee Lenexa, KS · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.2 Lenexa Manhattan, KS · 34d · ~$2.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.4 Manhattan Kansas City, MO · 40d · ~$2.5k all-in ($63/day) · score 3 Kansas City Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Netawaka
Netawaka · 40d · ~$2.4k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Netawaka, KS

Landlording in Netawaka, Kansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.9/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Netawaka is a city of 151 residents where 17.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $900/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Netawaka eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Netawaka closes 40 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Netawaka's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Netawaka runs $1,210 to $3,650 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 40 days of typical timeline and $900/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.3/10 in Netawaka, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Netawaka: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,650 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Netawaka

Trap · 4/10
For landlords, the 2.9/10 score is most actionable when combined with Jackson County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 4/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after the 3-day notice?

If you accept a partial payment after issuing a 3-day notice, you might unintentionally waive your right to evict based on that specific notice. It's best to either accept the full amount or none at all. If you accept a partial payment, you likely need to issue a new 3-day notice for the remaining balance.

Q2

Can I charge late fees in Netawaka?

Yes, you can charge reasonable late fees in Kansas. Your lease agreement must clearly state the amount of the late fee and when it will be applied. There's no specific cap under state law, but it must be reasonable and not excessive.

Q3

How do I handle a tenant who refuses to move out after their lease expires?

If a tenant stays past the end of their lease without your permission, they become a "holdover tenant." You generally need to serve them a notice to quit (often a 30-day notice for month-to-month tenancies, or a notice to vacate for a specific term lease) and then proceed with an eviction filing if they still don't leave. Don't assume you can just change the locks.

Q4

Is there rent control in Netawaka, KS?

No, there is no rent control in Netawaka or anywhere in Kansas. The state has preempted local governments from enacting rent control measures. This means you can generally raise rent to market rates, provided you give proper notice as per your lease agreement and state law (usually 30 days for month-to-month). For more information, see our Kansas rent control rules.

Q5

Do I need to give a reason to not renew a lease in Kansas?

No, Kansas does not have a statewide "just cause" eviction requirement. For month-to-month tenancies or when a fixed-term lease is expiring, you can generally choose not to renew the lease by providing the appropriate notice (usually 30 days) without stating a reason. However, you cannot refuse to renew for discriminatory or retaliatory reasons.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.9/10 places Netawaka in the 30th percentile of Kansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.