Watson's Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate

The 2 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 3.3 to 5.8, a 2.5-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address. 28% of renters spend 30% or more of household income on rent. The severe-burden share is 16%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Food insecurity affects 8.0% of adults, 9.8 points below the national rate. At $1,857 a month, rents sit 13% over what the rest of Glen Burnie commands.

5.0% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. That places it #11 of 10 neighborhoods in Glen Burnie.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. For a like-for-like read, Shannon Forest and Tydings score within a fraction of it.

Against average income of $164,186, annual rent is only 14%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Underwrite the address, not the area: with 2.5 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.