Skip to content
Laurel, Maryland eviction risk overview

Laurel, MD Eviction Risk: HIGH

Prince George's County · Population 29,798

In 2026
Risk score
8.2
HIGH

93th percentile, Maryland.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average3.5 Now8.2
10 5 1976 · score 1.6 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.6 1994 · score 2.6 1995 · score 2.6 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.9 1999 · score 2.9 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.8 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 3.0 2005 · score 3.1 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.8 2009 · score 3.9 2010 · score 4.0 2011 · score 4.2 2012 · score 4.2 2013 · score 4.3 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.9 2017 · score 5.1 2018 · score 5.4 2019 · score 5.6 2020 · score 6.4 2021 · score 6.5 2022 · score 6.5 2023 · score 6.6 2024 · score 6.5 2025 · score 7.3 2026 · score 8.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.5 Regional 7.5 State 5.7 Economic 5.5 Supply 9.3 Rent Control 5.8 Eviction 5.5 Tenant 9.5 Housing 5.3 8.2 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +75.1% (2024)
    7.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.5
  3. State political climate
    Maryland legislature & governorship
    5.7
  4. Economic stress
    9.2% poverty · 4.4% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,873 average · 55.8% renters
    9.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.3% of income on rent
    5.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    5.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    55.8% renters
    9.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Laurel and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Laurel compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Prince George's County
Elevated
#24 of 82 cities
Rank in county, 72nd percentileBottomTop
#24 of 82 cities in Prince George's County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Maryland
Very High
#50 of 532 cities
Rank in state, 91st percentileBottomTop
#50 of 532 cities in Maryland for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Laurel risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Laurel: 8.28.2LaurelThis cityCounty: 7.77.7Countyavg in countyState: 7.87.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 8.2
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 8.2/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+6.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,873/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $5,314-$18,177 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 55.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 29,798 residents, 55.8% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.5 and 7.5 (Dem margin +75.1% (2024)). State climate at 5.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.5, housing court bias 5.3, rent-control risk 5.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 9.3. The numbers behind those: 9.2% poverty, 4.4% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Laurel sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Baltimore, MD · 147d · ~$11.8k all-in ($80/day) · score 8.5 Baltimore Columbia, MD · 136d · ~$11.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.7 Columbia Germantown, MD · 153d · ~$11.8k all-in ($77/day) · score 8 Germantown Frederick, MD · 147d · ~$10.1k all-in ($69/day) · score 6.9 Frederick Waldorf, MD · 143d · ~$12.4k all-in ($87/day) · score 7.5 Waldorf Silver Spring, MD · 147d · ~$11.0k all-in ($75/day) · score 8 Silver Spring Ellicott City, MD · 143d · ~$11.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 7.3 Ellicott City Glen Burnie, MD · 157d · ~$11.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 7.9 Glen Burnie Gaithersburg, MD · 145d · ~$10.8k all-in ($74/day) · score 8.2 Gaithersburg Bethesda, MD · 143d · ~$11.8k all-in ($83/day) · score 8.1 Bethesda Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Laurel
Laurel · 144d · ~$11.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 8.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Laurel, MD

Landlording in Laurel, Maryland, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 8.2/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Laurel is a city of 29,798 residents where 55.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,873/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Laurel eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Laurel closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Laurel's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Laurel runs $5,314 to $18,177 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,873/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.5/10 in Laurel, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Maryland, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Laurel: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Maryland's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $18,177 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Laurel

Trap · 5.3/10
For landlords, the 7.3/10 score is most actionable when combined with Howard County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 5.3/10. At this tier, audit lease language and notice templates against Real Property 8-401 before any termination.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just ignores the 10-day notice?

If your tenant ignores the 10-day pay-or-quit notice, you proceed directly to filing a "Failure to Pay Rent" complaint in District Court. The notice is a legal prerequisite, not a negotiation tool. You've done your part; now the court process begins.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for property damage or lease violations other than non-payment?

Yes, you can. Maryland doesn't have a statewide just-cause requirement for terminating a lease, meaning you can evict for other lease violations. However, you must still provide proper notice, typically a 30-day notice to cure or quit for most violations. The process for filing in court will differ slightly from a non-payment case.
Q3

How do I avoid a tenant claiming "source of income" discrimination during screening?

Apply your screening criteria consistently to all applicants, regardless of their income source. If your income requirement is 3x rent, apply it to everyone. If your credit score minimum is 600, apply it to everyone. Document everything. You can reject an applicant for not meeting your financial or background criteria, but not simply because they use a housing voucher.
Q4

Is "cash for keys" legal in Maryland?

Yes, "cash for keys" is legal. It's a voluntary agreement between you and your tenant where you offer financial incentive for them to vacate the property quickly and peacefully. It's often a pragmatic solution to avoid the lengthy and expensive formal eviction process in high-risk areas like Laurel.
Q5

What if the tenant appeals the court's decision?

If a tenant appeals an eviction judgment, the process can be significantly delayed, often by several more weeks or months. You would likely need to continue working with your attorney to navigate the appeal process. This is another reason why proactive screening and clear communication are so vital; appeals prolong the already lengthy typical timeline of 144 days.
Q6

Are there any rent control rules in Laurel, MD?

No, there are no rent control rules currently in effect in Laurel or anywhere statewide in Maryland. However, always stay informed, as local regulations can change. For up-to-date information, refer to our Maryland rent control rules guide.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 8.2/10 places Laurel in the 93rd percentile of Maryland cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.